Your feedback allows us to better serve you! Nettoyager je sur wordt - 19 septembres. Here are what people say about us.
Nupedia Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful. Otherwise, there were relatively few rules initially and Wikipedia operated independently of Nupedia.
Language editions were also created, with a total of by the end of In the same interview, Wales also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable". The article revealed that sinceWikipedia had lost a third of the volunteer editors who update and correct the online encyclopedia and those still there have focused increasingly on minutiae.
This marked a significant increase over Januarywhen the rank was number 33, with Wikipedia receiving around Init received 8 billion pageviews every month.
There was a decline of about 2 billion between December and December Its most popular versions are leading the slide: Modifications to all articles would be published immediately.
As a result, any article could contain inaccuracies such as errors, ideological biases, and nonsensical or irrelevant text. Restrictions Due to the increasing popularity of Wikipedia, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions in some cases.
For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.
For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles,  which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December The "History" page of each article links to each revision.
Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of any changes. Vandalism on Wikipedia Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises the integrity of Wikipedia is considered vandalism.
The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor. Vandalism can also include advertising and other types of spam.
Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information to an article, can be more difficult to detect.
Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the underlying code of an article, or use images disruptively. Seigenthaler was falsely presented as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Wales replied that he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.
Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.
Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.
A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.
This is known as neutral point of view NPOV. Administration Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.
They do this by experiencing flow i.
Despite the name, administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent certain persons from making disruptive edits such as vandalism.Oct 02, · Oulfa est un site de rencontre sérieuse et gratuit.
Trouvez votre moitié grâce urbanagricultureinitiative.com Plus de 1 membres urbanagricultureinitiative.com Rencontre en ligne que dire Site de rencontre gratuit centre du québec Site de rencontre pour homme sportif Forum site de rencontre seniors Site de rencontre pres de.
Jul 06, · Quels sont les sites de rencontres vraiment gratuits? de tout les sites de chat et rencontres que j'ai vu,on annonce que c'est gratuit,mais des qu'on finit de remplir les formulaires,voila que la case des payements apparait!!!
tout est bluff!!!!! 1 following. 6 answers urbanagricultureinitiative.com: Open.
Site de rencontre gratuit et fiable Topito photo site de rencontre Flirter sans embrasser Site de rencontre voisins Rencontre celibataire à paris Site de rencontres au mali Je cherche un prenom garcon musulman Je cherche une fille pour travailler Filles cherche mariage à .
Site de rencontre vraiment gratuit en France pour des rencontres gratuites entre hommes et femmes avec tchat: rencontrer des hommes, des femmes, l'amour, des amis avec un des meilleurs sites de rencontre en France.
Rencontre Arles Site Rencontre Geek Québec Texto Pour Site De Rencontre Site De Rencontres Montpellier Starstruck Rencontre Avec Une Star Streaming Vf Gratuit Site De Rencontre Gratuit Pour La Belgique Site De Rencontres Mobile.